|
|
Post by Rajiv on Jun 24, 2012 18:12:42 GMT 8
.... If too many players opt out merely because they don't want the responsibility, I might need to provide further incentive. I could: * Increase the payment per player by $1 each. * Credit of $5 per team selector/captain ($3 as team selector, $2 as team captain). It would remain less for the 5-a-side at Kallang. Out of the increased payment, I could also increase the incentive for reports as follows: * $2 for the first report. * $3 for the best report (as chosen by the readers). For discussion only for now. I've added a poll. I'll let it run until the end of the year. |
|
|
|
Post by Rajiv on Aug 4, 2012 10:05:16 GMT 8
wow didn't realize you could get a total of $4 off per game as team selector, and game reporter... nice. How about a man of the match vote as well and $1 or $2 off that? The player of the game poll was discussed fairly extensively on the Discussion board under "Post-game reports & polls": .... It is up to individual players doing the first report whether they want to include a player poll, or any poll relating to the game that was played. .... In order to add a poll, you must have started the thread. .... No one seems to bother. I cover the credits for being team selector/captain and for doing the first report as they are incentives for taking on extra responsibilities. No extra responsibility in being voted player of the game, so if it were to be introduced, it would have to be funded differently. |
|
|
|
Post by Elvin on Aug 7, 2012 10:32:19 GMT 8
If you are covering the credits yourself, then you dont really need a consensus fm the players. Decision should be made based on how important you feel to have a match report and to get players to be team selectors.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rajiv on Aug 7, 2012 22:39:32 GMT 8
What I can cover I do. If it needs to be increased, or if players propose credits for other things, it will have to come from somewhere else. The question of course is whether additional credits are needed or wanted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kelvin Au on Sept 10, 2012 0:26:53 GMT 8
How about having a Match Preview? and $1 off  |
|
|
|
Post by Rajiv on Sept 10, 2012 9:04:02 GMT 8
Kelvin, I've moved your post here. Like I said above, if players propose credits for other things, it will have to come from somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rajiv on Sept 26, 2012 13:38:59 GMT 8
.... Man of the match: Whites Goalkeeper (last 15 mins) - Rajiv $1 for MOM & $2 for best & most insightful match report please! You'll need to vote in the other poll as well. .... ... if players propose credits for other things, it will have to come from somewhere else. .... What I can cover I do. ..... I will also be bearing the 6-monthly $50 credit for finishing top of each of the team selector and team manager tables myself, without any increase in the payment per player. |
|
|
|
Post by Rajiv on Mar 10, 2013 9:36:30 GMT 8
The team selector table is just starting to take off. Also: An increasing number of those who play on Sunday are opting out as team selectors. I think those who play at the weekends generally find it a hassle to be team selectors. On the basis that it is trickier to agree on teams with 16 players rather than 14 players, with effect from this weekend, I'll increase the team selector credit for 8-a-side games to $3 each. As far as opting out is concerned, players who want to opt out have to do so each time they put their name down for a game. I can't be dealing with standing instructions to opt out. If I accept standing instructions to opt out from one, then I will have to do so from others, and it becomes my burden to remember who has opted out and who hasn't. It is easier for each player to opt out each time. Just indicate "(NAATS)" after your name if you find typing "Not available as team selector" too much of a hassle. I'm bearing the increase. .... I've added a poll. I'll let it run until the end of the year. I've let it run a few months more, but I think I will close it now.
|
|
