Poor record on latecoming, late withdrawals & no shows
Posted by Rajiv Feb 7, 2014 20:09:27 GMT 8
Post by Rajiv on Feb 7, 2014 20:09:27 GMT 8
No shows are again in issue.
....
With immediate effect, I will also keep track of the following over a rolling two year period:
The poll is above.
As the poll question is too long to fit in the poll, I'll repeat it here - "Team selectors/captains should be allowed to replace players with poor records on latecoming, late withdrawals and no shows with a player from the waitlist who does not have a poor record."
What is a "poor record" is open to further discussion, but before we go there, I'd like to settle the principle of allowing such replacements to be made.
I'll leave the poll open until at least one-fifth of those on the Approved List vote.
With immediate effect, I will also keep track of the following over a rolling two year period:
- No shows.
- Very very late withdrawals (less than half an hour before the game).
- Very late withdrawals (3 to 1.5 hours before the game).
- Arriving late (more than 5 minutes late).
- Arriving very late (more than 15 minutes late).
Keeping track of latecoming will depend on it being mentioned on the report thread for the game.
I am open to discussing whether team selectors/captains should be allowed to replace any player with a poor record on latecoming, late withdrawals and no shows with a player from the waitlist who does not have a poor record. I'll put up a poll to that effect.
I am open to discussing whether team selectors/captains should be allowed to replace any player with a poor record on latecoming, late withdrawals and no shows with a player from the waitlist who does not have a poor record. I'll put up a poll to that effect.
The poll is above.
As the poll question is too long to fit in the poll, I'll repeat it here - "Team selectors/captains should be allowed to replace players with poor records on latecoming, late withdrawals and no shows with a player from the waitlist who does not have a poor record."
What is a "poor record" is open to further discussion, but before we go there, I'd like to settle the principle of allowing such replacements to be made.
I'll leave the poll open until at least one-fifth of those on the Approved List vote.